cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Doar o vorba sa-ti mai spun
Post Reply
User avatar
momolo
Moderator
Posts: 14344
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 10:11
Location: Bucuresti

cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by momolo »

Gun History
After reading the following historical facts, read the part
about Switzerland twice.

A LITTLE GUN HISTORY

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.. From 1929 to 1953,
about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.

------------------------------
In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million
Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.

------------------------------
Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total
of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated.

------------------------------
China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million
political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated

------------------------------
Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000
Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.

------------------------------
Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000
Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated

------------------------------
Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million
educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and
exterminated.

-----------------------------
Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century
because of gun control: 56 million.

------------------------------

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by
new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by their
own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500
million dollars. The first year results are now in:

List of 7 items:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2 percent.

Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6 percent.

Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300
percent. Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the
criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns!

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in
armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the
past 12 months, since criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is
unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the
ELDERLY. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public
safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was
expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The
Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it.

You won't see this data on the US evening (Obama's Own) news
channels.

Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes,
gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens

Take note my fellow Americans, before it's too late!

The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them
of this history lesson.

With guns, we are 'citizens.'
Without them, we are 'subjects'.

During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew
most Americans were ARMED!



SWITZERLAND ISSUES EVERY HOUSEHOLD A GUN!
SWITZERLAND'S GOVERNMENT TRAINS AND ISSUES EVERY ADULT A RIFLE.
SWITZERLAND HAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD.


DON'T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS
IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.

I'm a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment, if you are too, please forward.
Oare la noi, daca s-ar da liber la arme (ca in USA) am avea dupa aia tot aceeasi clasa politica ?
"Tinereţea este o noţiune, biologia un adevăr. Ele împreună dau dimensiunea existenţei"(Geo Bogza)

puf
Posts: 429
Joined: 09 Oct 2008, 20:30

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by puf »

Probabil de asta mi-am luat FN P90 Sub Machine Gun, Personal Defense Weapon.
Are doar 50cm lungime, cara 50 cartuse SS190 in un incarcator(penetreaza veste antiglont pana la clasa 4 de la 100m) este foarte usoara fiind din alcatuita din polimeri avand 3Kg cu tot cu munitie.
Sistemul de ochire optic tip holosight permite achizitia tintei fara inchiderea vreunui ochi si limitarea campului vizual.
Cu toate ca este conceputa ca arma de aparare nu a fost utilizata niciodata asa ci numai ca arma de asalt date fiind abilitatile deosebite.

User avatar
momolo
Moderator
Posts: 14344
Joined: 02 Oct 2008, 10:11
Location: Bucuresti

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by momolo »

puf, faina scula dar tocmai din aceasta cauza eu am preferat un sac cu grenade pus in debara.
"Tinereţea este o noţiune, biologia un adevăr. Ele împreună dau dimensiunea existenţei"(Geo Bogza)

kaav
Posts: 1721
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 18:33

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by kaav »

momolo wrote:.........
Oare la noi, daca s-ar da liber la arme (ca in USA) am avea dupa aia tot aceeasi clasa politica ?
Probabil ca nu, dar cred ca ''viclenia tzaraneasca'' a multora s-ar transforma in ''prudentza plina de masura'' (scuza-ti cacofonia intentzionata.... :mrgreen: ) iar instinctul de conservare ar functziona corect - viguros si cu frica de a nu arunca ochii pe ce nu iti apartzine...

kaav
Posts: 1721
Joined: 19 Oct 2008, 18:33

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by kaav »

Poate pare cinic topicul (relativ, este...) dar ca si fapt divers, Japonia daca ar fi avut o tzara cum avem noi, transmiteau stiri meteo de mult pe pe vreun ''Enterprise'', localizat langa Pluto. Nu exista scuze cand merge rau, doar acte de sabotaj. De ce gandesc asa? Japonia a facut din rahat, bici. Argumente ca nu se poate, tin doar de ...(logistica resurselor ''dozata'' potrivit momentului psihologic ca si resurse de influientza necesare momentului )
Atitudinea este tot - cu conditzia sa nu fi retardo' afectiv (simplificat spus...)

In fine, sa o spun mai simplu:

Daca iti este prea frica pentru tine personal, vei pierde (o logica elementara, genul de chestie care se ascunde sub pres de obicei. Castigi neaparat din asa ceva? (Evident ca nu...)
Dar........
Trebuie asumat esecul. Nu se naste nimic nou din ''Rexona'' si ''timpuri grele'' si sa crezi ca vei scoate o tzuica care este mai buna ca un cognac (asa, din calcai), pentru ca spune cineva aiurea in tramvai....Exista chesti cum am zis dar nu sunt pe toate drumurile, adica ''pasarea rara'' este rara.
Trebuie un ''nebun'' cu vocatzie, in plan politic...

Obelix
Posts: 1444
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 13:01

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by Obelix »

Pai nici romanelia nu e departe de Japonia... doar ca face din bici rahat... :roll:

User avatar
West
Posts: 504
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 08:22

Re: cetateni inarmati sau nu ?

Post by West »

momolo wrote: Oare la noi, daca s-ar da liber la arme (ca in USA) am avea dupa aia tot aceeasi clasa politica ?
Off
Eu sint pentru liber la Glock...pentru toti politistii romani. Din pacate, in autentic spirit mioritic, sint in stare sa le cumpere, dar sa nu cheltuie pe antrenamente. Mi se pare ca orice politie municipala ar trebui sa aiba in maruntaiele ei si sala de tragere.

Dar optica la noi este invers. Decit sa fie pregatiti, mai bine sa-i tina prosti cu radarul in boscheti sau sa-i puna, ca pe niste lachei, sa plimbe coloane oficiale cu tot felul de sefuti de partid care, patrunsi de maxima importanta a minusculei lor misiuni, nu stiu decit sa ridice praful de pe liniile de tramvai.

On
Nu cred in revolutii, pentru ca astea se fura in draci. Totdeauna.

Post Reply